top of page

Anti – Ragging Committee

The Supreme Court defined ragging in the Vishwa Magritte matter (1999) as, "Any disorderly conduct whether by words spoken or written or by an act which has the effect of teasing, treating or handling with rudeness any other student, indulging in rowdy or undisciplined activities which causes or is likely to cause annoyance, hardship or psychological harm or to raise fear or apprehension thereof in a fresher or a junior student or asking the students to do any act or perform something which such the students will not in the ordinary course and which has the effect of causing or generating a sense of shame or embarrassment so as to adversely affect the physique or psyche of a fresher or a junior student." (Raghavan Committee Report, 2007, para. 3.19).

  Other organisations/bodies working in this field have also attempted to define ragging, the variety of definitions being reflective of differences in perspective and interpretation. In 2007, the Committee of Consultants to Raghavan Committee considered ragging "neither a means of familiarization nor an introduction with freshers, but a form of psychopathic behaviour and a reflection of deviant personalities. Further, ragging reproduces the entrenched power configurations prevalent in civil society" (Raghavan Committee Report, 2007).

 

         Convener:           1.Mr.Surender

         Co-convener:  2.Mrs.K.Archana

         Members:            1.Mrs.Indumati

                                            2.Mrs.Alekhya

                                            3.Mr.Pavan

bottom of page